Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The standard of care a reasonable person owes to another.
B) A failure to live up to the standard of care a reasonable person owes to others.
C) Actual harm, or cause in fact, which results from a failure to live up to a standard of care.
D) Legal cause, or the extent to which the defendant is held responsible for actions that fall short of the standard of care.
E) An obligation to measure compensable losses suffered by the plaintiff.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) malfeasance
B) mistake
C) malpractice
D) criminal misconduct
E) workplace mishap
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Proximate cause.
B) Actual cause.
C) Cause in fact.
D) Significant cause.
E) Legal cause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only criminal prosecution of the CEO.
B) Only government-mandated bankruptcy and restructuring of the peanut company.
C) Potential criminal charges against the CEO, as well as civil lawsuits brought by injured victims.
D) Only lawsuits brought by victims, and never criminal charges.
E) Neither criminal nor civil prosecution because of assumption of the risk.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, as long as the dentist can prove he did not know about the risks.
B) Yes, as long as the dentist did not make any specific mistakes during the dental procedure.
C) Yes, as long as the dentist can prove that the risks are overstated.
D) Yes, because malpractice cases require intentional harm for a victim to prevail.
E) No, because a professional cannot defend against a negligence suit by claiming ignorance of generally accepted principles in his or her field of expertise.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) assumption of the risk
B) contributory negligence
C) comparative negligence
D) superseding cause
E) good Samaritan cause
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Proving reasonableness.
B) Seeking damages.
C) Arguing assumption of the risk.
D) Receiving punitive damages.
E) A defendant paying a prevailing plaintiff's legal fees.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Compensatory.
B) Punitive damages
C) Nominal damages.
D) Damages intended to reimburse a plaintiff for actual losses.
E) Pain and suffering compensation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The plaintiff can prevail as long as the plaintiff successfully showed causation and damages, even if the plaintiff did not prove breach of duty.
B) The plaintiff can prevail if the court believes the defendant should be punished for his conduct, even though a plaintiff could not establish all four elements of a negligence claim.
C) The plaintiff can prevail at the discretion of the judge if the judge believes it is too difficult for the plaintiff to meet the burden of proof.
D) The plaintiff will be denied recovery due to a failure to establish all four elements of a negligence case.
E) The plaintiff will be denied recovery only if the judge cannot subpoena the necessary witnesses to come and testify in court.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Actual cause and real cause.
B) Actual cause and significant cause.
C) Actual cause and proximate cause.
D) Premiere cause and significant cause.
E) Proximate cause and real cause.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It requires a finding of negligence.
B) It prohibits a finding of negligence.
C) The burden of proof shifts to the plaintiff.
D) The burden of proof shifts to the defendant.
E) The burden of proof rises to proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Motorist Safety to Yield statute.
B) Aid to Others statute.
C) Good Samaritan statute.
D) Assumption of the Risk statute.
E) Clear the Danger statute.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Last-clear-chance.
C) Modified comparative negligence.
D) Pure comparative negligence.
E) Both modified comparative negligence and last-clear-chance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If the stadium owner failed to fulfill its duty to provide reasonable protection because there were no barriers or other measures taken to protect game attendees from being struck by the ball.
B) In all circumstances where a ball hits game attendees, regardless of any other factors.
C) If the stadium owner took all cost-effective precautions but failed to take part in a multi-million dollar research effort to construct a robot to intercept foul balls.
D) If the baseball team was the home team and not the visiting team.
E) If the owner of the stadium was aware of a chance that a ball would strike a patron and failed to cancel the game, despite the risk.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Actual cause
B) Common law
C) Foreseeability
D) But-for causation
E) Strict liability
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 61 - 80 of 90
Related Exams