Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In relation to the question of whether the parties could be objectively seen to intend to create legal relations, the courts take into account a number of factors. What are those factors?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The courts take into account the followi...

View Answer

In Shortall v White [2007] NSWCA 272 the presumption against intention was rebutted because:


A) The parties had separated at the time.
B) The agreement would have been against public policy.
C) The promise was made before the relationship had broken down.
D) The promise was made before they were married.

E) C) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A 'rebuttable' presumption is:


A) One which can be disputed with factual evidence.
B) One which cannot be disputed by either party.
C) A presumption based upon the evidence.
D) A reasonable presumption.

E) None of the above
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When a business advertises their product, the courts generally presume that:


A) The merchant did not intend to enter into contracts with purchasers of their product.
B) The merchant did not intend to immediately create legal relations with viewers of the advertisement.
C) The merchant intended any contract with a purchaser to be legally binding.
D) The merchant intended their statements to be legally binding.

E) B) and C)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain the two legal presumptions that assist courts to determine the intention of parties that enter into agreements with each other. What does it mean when these presumptions are called 'rebuttable'?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In social, family, domestic or voluntary...

View Answer

In which type of agreement is the onus on the defendant to show that legal relations were not intended?


A) Domestic agreements.
B) Social agreements.
C) Commercial agreements.
D) Voluntary agreements.

E) B) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The case of Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia Incorporated (2001) 209 CLR 95 is authority for the principle that:


A) Intention to create an enforceable agreement remains an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.
B) The category of social or domestic agreements now includes religious institutions.
C) The existence of intention to create an enforceable agreement is a question of fact.
D) Intention to create an enforceable agreement is no longer an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.

E) B) and D)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The decision in Jones v Vernon Pools Ltd [1938] All ER 626 was based on the fact that:


A) The agreement was a social one.
B) The agreement was 'subject to contract.'
C) The ticket had been lost.
D) The coupon contained an 'honour clause.'

E) B) and D)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a non-commercial agreement, the onus is on the plaintiff to demonstrate intention.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A subjective test is used to determine the state of minds of the parties.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is NOT one of the possibilities identified by the High Court in Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353?


A) That the parties had reached final agreement.
B) That the parties had reached agreement but just wanted the deposit to be paid.
C) That the parties had reached agreement but wanted it to be recorded.
D) That the parties had postponed agreement until a formal contract was signed.

E) C) and D)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following cases did the court decide that a volunteer worker injured while working was not entitled to worker's compensation?


A) Teen Ranch Pty Ltd v Brown (1995) 38 AILR 5-036.
B) Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571.
C) Wakeling v Ripley (1951) SR(NSW) 183.
D) Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975.

E) All of the above
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following cases did the court decide that a husband's promise to his wife to pay her maintenance while they were forced to live apart was not contractually binding?


A) Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571.
B) Wakeling v Ripley (1951) SR(NSW) 183.
C) Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975.
D) Shortall v White [2007] NSWCA 272.

E) A) and C)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The law presumes that in social agreements the parties intend to create legal relations.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The existence or an intention to create a legally binding agreement is a question of law.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 35 of 35

Related Exams

Show Answer